As regulatory bodies tighten their grip and criminal tactics become more sophisticated, the need for robust Anti-Money Laundering (AML) measures has never been more crucial. Among these measures, ongoing monitoring, a part of due diligence measures, stands out as a frontline defence, vigilant against illicit financial activities. In this article, we delve into the significance, strategies, and emerging trends in ongoing monitoring practices in AML.

What is Ongoing Monitoring?

Ongoing monitoring refers to assessing and verifying customer information and relationships on an ongoing basis. The practice of ongoing monitoring helps mitigate financial risks, such as money laundering, terrorism financing, sanctions violations and other financial crimes. It is an essential part of third party risk management and helps companies with regulatory compliance and reputational damage prevention. 

The Significance of Ongoing Monitoring Processes 

AML regulations require financial institutions to implement measures to detect and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. Ongoing monitoring plays a pivotal role in fulfilling this mandate by enabling institutions to identify and flag suspicious transactions or behaviours that deviate from established patterns. By continuously scrutinising customer activities, institutions can minimise risks, safeguard their reputation, and maintain compliance with regulatory requirements.

Strategies for Effective Ongoing Monitoring

  1. Risk-Based Approach: Institutions must tailor their monitoring efforts to identify potential risks. High-risk customers and transactions demand closer scrutiny, while low-risk entities may undergo less frequent monitoring. This approach optimises resources and ensures a targeted response to potential threats.
  1. Advanced Analytics: Leveraging data analytics and machine learning enhances the effectiveness of ongoing monitoring. By analysing vast volumes of data in real-time, institutions can detect anomalies and patterns indicative of money laundering activities with greater accuracy and efficiency.
  1. Scenario-Based Monitoring: Implementing predefined scenarios and thresholds enables institutions to flag suspicious activities promptly. These scenarios may encompass unusual transactional behaviour, large cash transactions, or transactions involving high-risk jurisdictions, providing a structured framework for monitoring efforts.
  1. Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Regularly updating customer information through enhanced due diligence (EDD) processes enables institutions to better assess risk and tailor monitoring activities accordingly. Understanding customer profiles and transactional history is integral to identifying deviations and any suspicious activity in a timely manner.
  1. Collaboration and Information Sharing: Collaboration within the industry and sharing of intelligence facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of money laundering risks. Participating in forums, information-sharing platforms, and partnerships enhances institutions’ ability to detect emerging threats and adopt proactive measures.

Emerging Trends in Ongoing Monitoring

  1. Technological Advancements: Rapid advancements in technology, including artificial intelligence, blockchain, and big data analytics, are reshaping ongoing monitoring practices. Predictive analytics, network analysis, and entity resolution capabilities are revolutionising the detection and prevention of money laundering activities.
  1. Regulatory Developments: Regulatory bodies are continually refining AML guidelines to address evolving risks and challenges. Institutions must stay abreast of regulatory changes and adapt their ongoing monitoring practices accordingly to ensure compliance and mitigate potential penalties or reputational damage.
  1. Focus on Behavioral Analytics: Moving beyond traditional rule-based approaches, institutions are increasingly embracing behavioural analytics to identify suspicious patterns and anomalies in customer behaviour. By analysing transactional patterns and behavioural indicators, institutions can enhance their ability to detect sophisticated money laundering schemes.
  1. Enhanced Data Privacy Measures: With growing concerns surrounding data privacy and protection, institutions must strike a balance between monitoring effectiveness and respecting customer privacy rights. Implementing robust data protection measures and adopting privacy-enhancing technologies safeguard sensitive information while ensuring regulatory compliance.

Ongoing Monitoring Checks

Continuous monitoring processes are crucial for businesses to uphold regulatory compliance and mitigate financial risks. Key checks incorporated into this ongoing monitoring framework include:

Sanctions Screening:

Regular sanctions screening is vital to ensure that customers are not associated with sanctioned entities. Given the dynamic nature of sanctions lists, with frequent updates due to geopolitical developments, ongoing monitoring is essential. Integration of Regulatory Technology (RegTech) tools, such as tracking clients’ presence in news or on sanctions lists, enhances compliance efforts and mitigates the risk of financial crime.

Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) Checks:

Individuals holding prominent positions, along with their relatives and associates, are particularly vulnerable to corruption and may pose a heightened risk of money laundering or bribery. As clients’ statuses can evolve over time, such as through winning elections, it’s imperative to regularly reassess their PEP status. Flagging and reviewing their information, and applying enhanced due diligence when necessary, are integral components of this ongoing monitoring process.

Reputation Risk Media Screening:

The scrutiny of negative news coverage, known as adverse media checks, is essential for ongoing monitoring, especially if a customer is featured negatively in global media. Such coverage can signify an increased risk of anti-money laundering (AML) violations. By monitoring clients’ public profiles, businesses can swiftly identify shifts in their risk profiles, thereby safeguarding their reputation.

Ultimate Beneficial Ownership (UBO) Verification:

Identifying ultimate beneficial owners  is critical for combating financial crimes, as criminals often exploit complex ownership structures. Through ongoing monitoring, businesses can detect changes in ownership and identify individuals posing heightened risks. Timely action can then be taken to address these risks effectively.

Transaction Monitoring

Transaction monitoring systematically scrutinises transactions within financial systems to identify and flag potentially suspicious activities. This process is essential for detecting potential risks and preventing fraudulent activities as it allows you to react to suspicious activity in real time. 

Last thoughts

As financial crimes continue to pose significant threats to the integrity of the global financial system, ongoing monitoring remains a cornerstone of effective AML efforts. By adopting a risk-based approach, leveraging advanced analytics, and embracing emerging trends, financial institutions can fortify their defences against money laundering activities. In a landscape characterised by complexity and uncertainty, ongoing monitoring serves as a beacon of vigilance, guiding institutions in their relentless pursuit of financial integrity and security.

    Stay in the loop with the latest industry news
    Thousands of subscribers already joined our monthly mailing list to receive the latest news, updates and insider information on our product. Join them by entering your email below.

    FAQ

    In AML, high risk factors can vary from sanctioned parties to suspicious behaviour patterns, geographical client location and so on. High risk clients are any clients that need additional processes in place to minimise fraud risk, which often involves ongoing monitoring.
    PEPs, or Politically Exposed Persons, are individuals who hold prominent public positions or have significant influence in government, politics, or international organisations. These positions can expose them to a higher risk of corruption and financial misconduct.
    Sanctions are measures imposed by governments or international bodies to enforce compliance with specific laws, policies, or international agreements. They are often used as a tool of foreign policy to address various objectives, such as promoting human rights, preventing terrorism, deterring nuclear proliferation, or addressing threats to international peace and security.